In 2019, Definitive Healthcare tracked a total of 294 hospital mergers & acquisitions. This market activity brings the total number of health systems down to just 1,038—compared to the 7,247 active hospitals in the United States.
Industry consolidation of this scale results in larger health systems with significant market share and influence. Health systems can leverage this influence to negotiate lower healthcare supply costs on behalf of their member facilities. Though consolidation and negotiation should result in lower overall supply chain spending, recent reports indicate that hospital supply costs have been on the rise.
How much do U.S. hospitals spend on supplies?
On average, supply chain costs make up about about 33 percent, or one-third, of total hospital expenses. According to Definitive Healthcare data, U.S. hospitals spent a combined total of $36 billion on supply chain purchases in 2018. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this trend in excess supply chain spending is only slated to continue.
In a May 2020 report, the American Hospital Association (AHA) estimated that U.S. hospitals and health systems spent a combined $2.4 billion in additional supply costs during the first four months of the pandemic. These additional costs were largely associated with the purchase of personal protective equipment (PPE) and other necessary supplies to aid in the fight against the COVID-19 virus.
Though the extenuating circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic certainly warrant this temporary increase in supply chain spending, the overall trend in rising supply chain costs can have damaging effects on hospital and health system finances.
How can U.S. hospitals control supply chain spending?
Unlike labor costs or other elements of total operating expenses, hospital supply costs can be minimized without sacrificing efficiency or care quality. Supply costs are also more discretionary than other facility expenses, which makes them much easier to impact within the hospital or health system budget.
Here’s a closer look at two ways that hospitals and health systems can directly impact their supply chain spending.
Physician preference items
Physician preference items (PPIs) are the medical supplies that healthcare providers use in treatments and procedures. These items can include medical devices, implants, pharmaceuticals, and other non-clinical items such as disinfectants and disposable examination gloves.
Hospitals can lower their total supply chain costs by reducing physician preference item spending. PPI costs are much easier to impact in high-cost specialties like orthopedics, cardiology, and other surgical specialties—which rely heavily on specialized implants and prosthetics. Other physician specialties, like family medicine, have standardized costs and therefore report much lower annual PPI spending.
PPIs have been commonly used as a way to ensure that care providers could access their preferred supplies, with the understanding that these items were most suitable for a given patient or procedure. These preferred items can, however, be more expensive than alternatives with similar clinical outcomes. Because of this, physician preference item spending can lead to an unnecessary increase in supply expenses—especially given the fact that PPIs can account for between 40 and 60 percent of total hospital supply costs.
Finding comparable, lower-cost physician preference items is a good way for hospitals and health systems to reduce their overall supply chain spending.
Supply chain management technologies
Electronic supply chain management applications are another way that hospitals can control their supply chain spending. According to a January 2019 survey from Syft and Sage Growth Partners, roughly 97 percent of healthcare executives and supply chain leaders agreed that supply chain analytics could positively impact hospital costs.
In fact, 87 percent of survey respondents agreed that these technologies could help improve hospital margins by more than 1 percent. For a hospital with $500 million in total revenues and a 1 percent margin, that supply chain management system could result in gains of between $5 and $15 million.
Despite this overwhelming support, 64 percent of survey respondents reported that they do not use a dedicated supply chain management system. Of those Syft survey respondents who did report using this technology, approximately three-quarters indicated that they were primarily using their supply chain management systems to track inventory and consolidate suppliers.
While these actions are valuable, only 42 percent of survey respondents reported that they could use their supply chain management system for more advanced functions like tracking costs by surgeon or anticipating supply expiration dates—both of which could help to eliminate or significantly reduce excess spending for physician preference items and other medical supplies.
Definitive Healthcare CEO, Jason Krantz, uses this 45-minute presentation to discuss the ways in which the healthcare industry has been most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic—from hospital finances, to the delay in elective surgeries and changes in telehealth implementation.
Originally published April 26, 2019
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Rachel Grande is a communications professional and published author. She holds a master’s degree in Creative Writing from the University of Glasgow, and brings prior experience as a marketing and ...